Poster Presentation International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups 2022 - Hosted by ADIPS

Does the method of insulin delivery impact the frequency of consultations during antenatal care for patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus? (#95)

Cecily Foged 1 , Rachel Miller 1 , Tamara Hudson 1 , Sharon Chan 1 , Elizabeth Sterling 1 , Christine Houlihan 1
  1. The Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg Melbourne, VIC, Australia

 

Availability of technology assisting antenatal glycemic control in maternal Type 1 diabetes has increased over the last 5 years;  due to Australia’s national diabetes support scheme (ndss) funding continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)/flash sensor since March 2019.  A need for frequent adjustments to insulin therapy in pregnancy are commonplace. We sought to examine if mode of insulin delivery; multiple daily injection(MDI) or insulin pump(CSII) differ in demand on clinical resources.

Aims:

In a Melbourne public antenatal diabetes clinic, we sought to determine:

(i) the proportion of patients using CGM/Flash sensor, MDI and CSII  

(ii) the number of antenatal appointments, for glycemia review, according to method of insulin delivery

 

Method:  This is a retrospective review of patients with pre-existing T1DM, who received antenatal care at Mercy hospital for Women, over 4 consecutive years,  January 2018-December 2021. Data included glucose monitoring, mode of insulin delivery, total number of clinic appointments, and gestation at each  appointment. Only appointments from CDE and/or diabetes physician/registrar for glycemic control were counted .  Pre-pregnancy, pregnancy loss <16 weeks, postpartum appointments and patients transferred for delivery only were excluded. Data is expressed as mean(sd).

Results:

A total of 89 patients (41 MDI, 48 CSII).  Mean gestation at delivery was 36 (1.8) weeks, (range 30 to 38weeks). 3 patients commenced CSII in pregnancy. Pre and post ndss subsidy, 56% vs 100% of patients used cgm/flash sensor. Approximately half of patients used CSII (Table 1). The overall number of glycemic appointments per pregnancy, was 14.2(4.5) and did not differ between MDI vs CSII 13.8(4.1) vs 14.1(4.6) respectively, p = 0.7). The glycemic appointments range per pregnancy 2  - 24. 

Table 1: CGM/Libre sensor use and mode of Insulin delivery during pregnancy

 

2018

2019

2020

2021

Total patients

16

19

24

30

Use of CGM/flash sensor n (%)

9

(56%)

17

(89%)

22

(92%)

30

(100%)

MDI

8

9

12

12

CSII n (%)

8

(50%)

10

(53%)

12

(50%)

18

(60%)

Table 2: Number of glycemic reviews per pregnancy according to mode of insulin delivery

 

MDI

CSII

P Value

2018

11.8 (3.6)

12.5 (4.0)

 

2019

13.0 (4.5)

15.1 (6.2)

 

2020

15.0 (5.2)

14.8 (6.4)

 

2021

14.4 (2.2)

14.9 (3.1)

 

 

 

 

 

Overall

13.8 (4.1)

14.1 (4.6)

0.74 (ns)

  

Conclusion:

The uptake of CGM/flash sensor use since ndss subsidy for pregnancy increased.  Pregnancy is an intense period for glycemic review, with average 14 visits per pregnancy, with no difference between MDI or CSII.